2002 Peugeot 307 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Peugeot 307 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot 307 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot 307 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot 307. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot 307.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot 307 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Peugeot | Triumph |
Model | 307 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |