2002 Peugeot 307 vs. 2010 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Korando is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot 307. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot 307 would be higher. At 3,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Korando (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot 307. (134 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot 307. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 504 kg more than 2002 Peugeot 307. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Peugeot 307. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot 307. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot 307. 2010 SsangYong Korando has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot 307 has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot 307 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Peugeot 307 | 2010 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Peugeot | SsangYong |
| Model | 307 | Korando |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1361 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 15.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
