2002 Peugeot H2O vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot H2O. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot H2O would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Peugeot H2O weights approximately 70 kg more than 2006 Volvo S60.
Because 2006 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Peugeot H2O. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot H2O | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | H2O | S60 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |