2002 Peugeot RC vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot RC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot RC would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 1412 kg more than 2002 Peugeot RC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Dodge DURANGO has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot RC has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot RC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge DURANGO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Peugeot RC | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
| Make | Peugeot | Dodge |
| Model | RC | DURANGO |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2312 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1801 mm |
