2002 Peugeot RC vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot RC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot RC would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 940 kg more than 2002 Peugeot RC.
Because 2002 Peugeot RC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Peugeot RC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Ford EDGE has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot RC has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot RC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford EDGE will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot RC | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | RC | EDGE |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4679 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2223 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1702 mm |