2002 Peugeot Sesame vs. 1965 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Peugeot Sesame is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1965 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (94 Nm @ 3760 RPM). This means 2002 Peugeot Sesame will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot Sesame | 1965 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Peugeot | Triumph |
Model | Sesame | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3760 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1210 mm |