2002 Peugeot Sesame vs. 1969 Simca 1501
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Simca 1501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Simca 1501 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Peugeot Sesame is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Simca 1501. (81 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame should accelerate faster than 1969 Simca 1501.
Because 1969 Simca 1501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Simca 1501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Simca 1501. (124 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2002 Peugeot Sesame will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Simca 1501.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Peugeot Sesame | 1969 Simca 1501 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Simca |
| Model | Sesame | 1501 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1475 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
