2002 Peugeot Sesame vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2003 Renault Scenic II is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot Sesame. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot Sesame would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Peugeot Sesame is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Peugeot Sesame will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Peugeot Sesame | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
| Make | Peugeot | Renault |
| Model | Sesame | Scenic II |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
