2002 Peugeot Sesame vs. 2010 Kia Rondo
To start off, 2010 Kia Rondo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot Sesame. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot Sesame would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Rondo (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Rondo (169 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Rondo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. 2010 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot Sesame has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot Sesame will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot Sesame | 2010 Kia Rondo | |
Make | Peugeot | Kia |
Model | Sesame | Rondo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |