2002 Peugeot Sesame vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot Sesame. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot Sesame would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 252 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Peugeot Sesame | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Peugeot | Holden |
Model | Sesame | Commodore |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |