2002 Pininfarina Start vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Pininfarina Start. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Pininfarina Start would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP) has 226 more horse power than 2002 Pininfarina Start. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Pininfarina Start.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Pininfarina Start has automatic transmission and 2010 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Pininfarina Start will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Pininfarina Start | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Pininfarina | Chevrolet |
| Model | Start | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 426 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2852 mm |
