2002 Pininfarina Start vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Pininfarina Start. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Pininfarina Start would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 200 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2002 Pininfarina Start is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Pininfarina Start. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Pininfarina Start has automatic transmission and 2010 Volkswagen Eos has manual transmission. 2010 Volkswagen Eos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Pininfarina Start will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Pininfarina Start | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Pininfarina | Volkswagen |
Model | Start | Eos |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2578 mm |