2002 Pininfarina Start vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Pininfarina Start. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Pininfarina Start would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Pininfarina Start is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pininfarina Start (200 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2013 Kia RIO. (136 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pininfarina Start should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia RIO.
Because 2002 Pininfarina Start is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Pininfarina Start. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Pininfarina Start | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Pininfarina | Kia |
Model | Start | RIO |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 136 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |