2002 Pontiac Solstice vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Solstice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pontiac Solstice (240 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Pontiac Solstice weights approximately 818 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Pontiac Solstice (305 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2002 Pontiac Solstice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Pontiac Solstice | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Pontiac | Suzuki |
| Model | Solstice | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |
