2002 Porsche Boxster vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Porsche Boxster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Porsche Boxster would be higher. At 2,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Porsche Boxster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Porsche Boxster (224 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Porsche Boxster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Porsche Boxster (260 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Porsche Boxster | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Porsche | Toyota |
Model | Boxster | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2687 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.9 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.3 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |