2002 Proton 300 vs. 2010 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Laguna (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2002 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Laguna (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Proton 300 | 2010 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Proton | Renault |
Model | 300 | Laguna |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |