2002 Proton 400 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Proton 400. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 108 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Proton 400 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Proton | Nissan |
| Model | 400 | Micra |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2449 mm |
