2002 Proton 400 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 400 would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 400. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2002 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 2002 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Proton 400 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Proton | Smart |
Model | 400 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 1867 mm |