2002 Proton Impian vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton Impian. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton Impian would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Proton Impian. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton Impian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Proton Impian weights approximately 135 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (149 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton Impian. (140 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton Impian.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Proton Impian | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Proton | Renault |
| Model | Impian | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |
