2002 Renault Avantime vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Avantime. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Avantime would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Renault Avantime. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Avantime.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Avantime (320 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Renault Avantime will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Avantime | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Avantime | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2186 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |