2002 Renault Clio vs. 1948 Simca 5
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1948 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 470 kg more than 1948 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Renault Clio | 1948 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Renault | Simca |
| Model | Clio | 5 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1948 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
