2002 Renault Clio vs. 1949 Saab 92
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1949 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1949 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 605 kg more than 1949 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 1949 Saab 92 | |
Make | Renault | Saab |
Model | Clio | 92 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |