2002 Renault Clio vs. 1952 Toyota SA
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (78 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Toyota SA weights approximately 186 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Renault Clio | 1952 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | SA |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1461 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2410 mm |
