2002 Renault Clio vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,451 cc, 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 200 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2002 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1451 cc |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |