2002 Renault Clio vs. 1991 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1991 Suzuki Swift. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1991 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 580 kg more than 1991 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Renault Clio | 1991 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Clio | Swift |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |
