2002 Renault Clio vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Rover 200 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 200 (180 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 1993 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Renault Clio | 1993 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | Clio | 200 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 88 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
