2002 Renault Clio vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 414i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 414i (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 560 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 414i (167 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Renault Clio | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | Clio | 414i |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2780 mm |
