2002 Renault Clio vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 60 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Because 1999 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota MR2 (183 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | MR2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 91.5 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 48 L |