2002 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Volvo S80
To start off, 2005 Volvo S80 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2005 Volvo S80. (134 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S80 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 2002 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo S80. (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 2005 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | S80 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |