2002 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 635 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13 seconds | 8.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |