2002 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,290 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 678 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (350 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio. 2009 Saab 05-Sep has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saab 05-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 2009 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Renault | Saab |
Model | Clio | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |