2002 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Volvo S80 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S80 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S80 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S80 (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 2009 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | S80 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |