2002 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Clio | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Renault | Jeep |
Model | Clio | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1461 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 3.7 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.3 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 93 L |