2002 Renault Megane vs. 1969 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2002 Renault Megane is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Megane (75 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Megane weights approximately 215 kg more than 1969 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Megane (100 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: