2002 Renault Megane vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (99 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Megane | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Megane | E-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 99 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |