2002 Renault Megane vs. 2011 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 948 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (133 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2011 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 2011 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Megane | 2011 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Renault | SsangYong |
Model | Megane | Rodius |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |