2002 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 583 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Megane | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Renault | Cadillac |
Model | Megane | CTS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 11.3 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1868 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.3 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |