2002 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volkswagen Golf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Golf (168 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (104 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 136 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Golf (240 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 2013 Volkswagen Golf has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Golf will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Renault Megane | 2013 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
Model | Megane | Golf |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1401 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1779 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.9 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.9 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |