2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,377 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (266 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 579 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Rolls-Royce Park Ward 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Rolls-Royce Cadillac
Model Park Ward CTS
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5377 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 322 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 499 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 5700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 11.7
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2400 kg 1821 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]