2002 Rover 45 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 45 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2002 Rover 45. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 45.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 45. (138 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Rover 45 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | 45 | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 138 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |