2002 Saab 9-X vs. 2010 Ford Edge
To start off, 2010 Ford Edge is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Saab 9-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Saab 9-X would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Edge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Saab 9-X (300 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Ford Edge. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Saab 9-X should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Edge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Edge weights approximately 1121 kg more than 2002 Saab 9-X.
Because 2002 Saab 9-X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Edge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saab 9-X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Edge (474 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Saab 9-X. (410 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Edge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Saab 9-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Saab 9-X | 2010 Ford Edge | |
| Make | Saab | Ford |
| Model | 9-X | Edge |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 2451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2126 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |
