2002 Samsung SM3 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Samsung SM3 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Samsung | Ford |
Model | SM3 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |