2002 Saturn SC vs. 1969 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2002 Saturn SC is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Sunbeam Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Sunbeam Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Saturn SC has automatic transmission and 1969 Sunbeam Alpine has manual transmission. 1969 Sunbeam Alpine will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Saturn SC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Saturn SC | 1969 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Saturn | Sunbeam |
Model | SC | Alpine |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |