2002 Saturn SC vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2002 Saturn SC is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Saturn SC (101 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Saturn SC weights approximately 324 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Saturn SC (155 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Saturn SC | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Saturn | Zastava |
Model | SC | 102 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |