2002 Saturn SC vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Saturn SC would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Saturn SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Saturn SC has automatic transmission and 2009 Subaru Outback has manual transmission. 2009 Subaru Outback will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Saturn SC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Saturn SC | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Saturn | Subaru |
Model | SC | Outback |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 243 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |