2002 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo S60 (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 534 kg more than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Seat Inca Kombi | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Seat | Volvo |
| Model | Inca Kombi | S60 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1391 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1569 kg |
