2002 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2010 Alpina B5

To start off, 2010 Alpina B5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Alpina B5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alpina B5 (493 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 434 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alpina B5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Alpina B5 weights approximately 775 kg more than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Alpina B5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Alpina B5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Alpina B5 (700 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 593 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Alpina B5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. 2010 Alpina B5 has automatic transmission and 2002 Seat Inca Kombi has manual transmission. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Alpina B5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: