2002 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2010 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daewoo Matiz (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 164 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Seat Inca Kombi | 2010 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Seat | Daewoo |
| Model | Inca Kombi | Matiz |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1391 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 871 kg |
