2002 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2011 Mazda 6

To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 449 kg more than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. 2011 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2002 Seat Inca Kombi has manual transmission. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: