2002 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1102 kg more than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Seat Inca Kombi | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Seat | Volvo |
| Model | Inca Kombi | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1391 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 2137 kg |
